Somehow another sensational pre-print study from July, titled “Covid-19 vaccinations and all-cause mortality — a long-term differential analysis among municipalities” missed getting covered by corporate media. But hey, how can you blame them, it was the middle of summer and I’m sure stories like “The Bermuda Triangle, harrowing tales of bikini waxing gone wrong” were simply more important. Okay I made that one up, but these days I’m sure some government has funded a study of it!

For the record in case, you didn’t’ realize it, Dutch people come from the Netherlands, NOT Denmark. People from Denmark are called Danes, not to be confused with Great Danes, while I’m sure some Danes are, that’s a whole different species.

Anyways in the study, a Dutch researcher compared overall mortality rates in Dutch cities between 2019, 2020, and 2021. He explained that he relied on all-cause mortality to avoid confounders of age, culture, population density, and problems with rules for counting covid deaths.

What he found was there was NO statistical correlation between all-cause mortality when comparing the pre-vaccine period to the period after the vaccines came out and suggested that it suggests the vaccines were NOT effective at preventing deaths, despite what that public health experts have been touting. From the report:

“Normalized to 2019, we found no correlation between municipal mortality in 2020 with vaccination uptake in 2021, which shows the effectiveness of our confounder accounting. We could not observe a mortality-reducing effect of vaccination in Dutch municipalities after vaccination and booster campaigns… Our results add to other recent findings of zero mRna-vaccine effectiveness on all-cause mortality, calling for more research on this topic.”

Have I got your interest, great cause it’s get even more fascinating, the researcher observed a STRONG statistical correlation between the dual vaccine rollouts and increased all-cause mortality, in other words, he found spikes of deaths around the two big injection pushes, once again quoting the report:

“We did find a 4-sigma-significant mortality-enhancing effect during the two periods of high unexplained excess mortality.”

In layman’s terms, the study also showed strong evidence that the vaccines were not ‘safe’ either. So, a simple comparison of all-cause mortality during the pre- and post-vaccine periods shows neither safety nor efficacy. Doesn’t quite sound like what was promised huh?

The sheer fact that this study was report at all shows that those wishing to suppress such information can only do so for so long, at first it may tickle out but eventually it will be gushing, like the comparative mask studies.

I've attached the study as PDF you can download.