Give how busy corporate media was covering another major story this week, you know about Madonna the singer, who in a quest to stay relevant at 64, stated she’s GAY. It’s not any wonder you might have missed this minor story, the one about a video clip from the EU Parliament which went viral Tuesday, after a Pfizer executive testified, admitting that the pharma company “never” tested its drug to see if it would prevent transmission of the virus.
You can’t make this shit up; it just writes itself!

So, just one question for all the pimps of the injections, what was all the “95% effective” all about, then? 95% of WHAT, half a percent? I would love to now hear from all the politicians, TV doctors, medical health officers and Karen’s & Ken’s who were proclaiming that the mRNA drugs would “shut down the pandemic?” I would love to know why news anchors who were beamed into home nightly, kept saying over and over that these magic potions would make people a “viral dead end?” You know “Stop Transmission!” It's simple, either that they were all just making it up, or it’s just been one giant misunderstanding, whoppsie our bad!

For those of you who’ve not seen the clip I encourage you to do so, far from being contrite and recognizing the gravity of the malfeasance, she appears to double down and become kind of defensive. Who can blame her, after all she’s part of the ruling class, how dare you rubes question me.

While that is certainly a revelation, it’s what she went on to say that needs to be zeroed in on, the executive continued, telling the MEPs that “We had to really move at the speed of science…to really understand what is taking place in the market.”

For starters, can anyone tell me the definition of the first part of her statement “the speed of science?” Having heard this term a few times, while it sounds all “modern & scientific sounding” what does it MEAN? Are we saying that science needs to move at the blinding speed of light? If so and call me crazy, but if it moved at this speed couldn’t the chance of things possibly going wrong go up like dramatically? I mean after all the first polio vaccination was attempted in 1935 and it wasn’t until the 1980’s that the most effective and efficient vaccine to combat it was produced. By my math that’s about 50 years, not exactly the speed of light huh?

Now let’s unpack the second part “to understand what is taking place in the market.” The MARKET. Which market is she talking about, is it us, are we now the market? Or is it the potential sales market, where being first out in the market assures the biggest profits? After all marketing these days is a science as well, kzillions of dollars are spent on figuring out how to sell us stuff all the time. Not sure about you but doesn’t sound all “touchy & feely” and all that caring to me!

On the bright side though, this Pfizer executive may not have to be worried too much about being grilled in the future given Pfizer stock price is continuing to decline. Back in March 2020 it was trading around $30 per share and by December 2021 was just over $60 per share, however, now that some of the luster has come off is back down to around $42 per share.

Not sure about you but I’m fine with Pfizer’s “speed of demise, taking place in the market!”