In another story that I’m sure CBC (Censorship Before Coverage) is too busy to report on, an explosive Swedish study presented at a recent European medical conference was titled “Significant incidence of myocarditis after 3rd dose of anti-COVID 19 messenger RNA vaccine” (translated).

Here are the Four main take away’s from the study’s authors:

• Before this study, there were no prospective data on myocardial lesions after vaccination with an mRNA vaccine. Only the most severe myocarditis hospitalized cases have been reported, mostly affecting men under the age of 18.

• The authors found the actual incidence of post-vaccine myocardial lesions occurred in a whopping 2.8% of all participants, way more than the statistically insignificant 0.0035% of myocarditis claimed in other retrospective studies.

• The myocardial lesions affected women (3.7%) more than men (0.8%) this is opposite of what has been described in previous studies.

• Therefore, the authors concluded, repeated doses of the vaccine should be taken only with great caution, due to possible repeated myocardial lesions, and their effects on possible future cardiovascular complications.

Whereas ‘myocarditis’ merely refers generally to inflammation of the heart muscle, the Swedish researchers looked specifically for permanent cardiac damage in the form of scarring or ‘myocardial lesions’. They detected the lesions by measuring vaccine recipients’ troponin levels before and after each injection (and later compared their results to available statistics on admissions for chest pain).

The results point to what others in the scientific community have been seeing as well as what the manufacturer has reluctantly had to admit to as well, that some of those that been injected with this pharmaceutical intervention, have ‘subclinical’ heart damage. The good news is that it isn’t acute enough to prompt them into the hospital, or to go see their doctor, however on the downside, nevertheless it will lower their life expectancies, exactly how much, remains to be seen.

I’ve attached the link to the actual study in the notes below, please share it with anyone who believes in that old antiquated notion of “informed consent!”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35455324/