I’m sure that you didn’t know that back in April, the Journal of Clinical Medicine published an explosive study on the down-low, titled, “The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study.”

For some strange reason, corporate & mainstream media kinda overlooked this little story.

Wanting to practice the age-old art of science, the researchers studied 800,000 adults (200,000 who were covid-infected, and 600,000 controls) to see if covid sufferers were at higher risk for myocarditis and pericarditis.

Here is what the researchers concluded:

-Post COVID-19 infection was not associated with either myocarditis or pericarditis. We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

Seems odd, no?

It’s odd, because the CDC has been putting forth the following for a year now, basically that pharmaceutical intervention is perfectly safe and warranted because the risk of getting myocarditis and pericarditis after covid is higher than the risk of acquiring those dangerous conditions from the pharmaceutical intervention. However, from the data the Israeli researchers found the exact opposite.

Which creates a conundrum, whom to believe?

Not only is that an issue of course, but the CDC’s whole myocarditis risk theory depends on the pharmaceutical intervention preventing infections, which according to the manufacturer as we’ve learned recently, it doesn’t. All this to say, even if we suspended disbelief and went along with the CDC’s premise that Covid DOES increase myocarditis risk, by taking the pharmaceutical intervention, wouldn’t you encounter DOUBLE the potential risk: the risk from the pharmaceutical intervention as well as the risk from covid? If I’m missing something here, please feel free to point it out and correct me, it won’t be the first time in my life I’ve been wrong.

Unlike corporate journalists who seems to struggle with a basic google search when it comes to uncovering data and studies, I for some strange reason got lucky and found a few that explore the relationship between the pharmaceutical intervention and myocarditis. I’ve included the links to these in the notes below.

Personally, I’m more than happy to offer this public service to both the CDC and Health Canada. I know how overworked they are and given that it’s easy to see how they may have simply overlooked these studies which have been out for almost a year now. I’m sure that as soon as they put their crack expert teams on reviewing these studies, both the CDC & Health Canada will be updating its vaccination guidance pronto, right?

Even if they don’t do that, I’m sure at a minimum they’ll MENTION this most recent study along with the others right, given that they’re committed to “informed consent?”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025013/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35805941/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35488842/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35194974/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34865500/